“There seems to be a general movement in the direction of this kind of ultimate revolution, this method of control by which people can be made to enjoy a state of affairs which by any decent standard, they ought not to enjoy.”

Aldous Huxley, 1962

In an idiotic move Friday, the maniacal government of the state of Mississippi has declared war on all “infected” people (though of course a definition of “infection” is not provided, meaning it may be applied to anyone).
In an absurd and nonsensical order, the state government has threatened to fine and JAIL any “infected” who do not lock themselves up and cut themselves off from the world.
To make the move even more moronic, the order does not even require the pretense of a false positive test result nor a negative result to “end isolation”.
It would be safe to assume at this point that if the people of Mississippi do not stand up, march on their statehouse and demand the immediate resignation of these uber-commie lunatics then their liberties and their children’s futures will be forever lost. Seeing the responses of the American public to this point, I’m going to bet on the latter.

Owen Shroyer, a reporter and syndicated talk show host, was arrested by the FBI for exposing federal overreach. Meanwhile, Dr. Joseph Mercola, a leader in honest health journalism, was recently forced to delete 25 years worth of reporting from his website. It seems we are finally getting what we deserve.

“We’re probably going to be needing to prioritize boosters for older, more vulnerable people”…
…Wait, what??

More than 1% of the 10,000 fully vaccinated coronavirus cases in Massachusetts died… from covid

The leftist controlled DHS is preparing its enforcers for a situation it is creating.
This situation is being instigated by the institution of an oppressive, irrational and arbitrary federal government forced compliance mandate which is to include forced vaccinations, forced masking, restriction of travel, restriction of firearm ownership and restriction of speech and the redress of government.

This institution is designed in part to charge the emotional state of those already upset with current mandates (we will call them the target demographic) in an attempt to goad these individuals into violent action. To further the chance for violent push-back, the DHS is working to create a protocol wherein any who oppose these mandates will be labeled as “violent extremists”.

This devious, premeditated, non-reactional psychological tactic creates what is called “predictive programing” within the target demographic and the institutional enforcers, whoever they may be.

In the target demographic, labeling them as “violent” and “extreme” consistently and repetitively, even though they are currently not, will eventually lead the weak minded in this group to believe that violence and extremity may be their only course of action.

In the institutional enforcers the labeling of the target demographic as “violent” and “extreme”, even though they are currently not, creates an opinion within their minds that this demographic group has the potential for violent and extreme actions, even though they may not.

Coupled with the current oppressive attempts to restrict the rights and liberties of ordinary, peaceful individuals, this predictive programing creates an inevitable collision course between the target demographic and the enforcers.

This collision course would create what is called a “false flag” attack, wherein one group is coerced into violent action by another for ulterior motives. If the coercion fails, it would be more than safe to assume that plans have been made by clandestine elements of the enforcer groups to themselves conduct “false flag” attacks and blame these attacks on the target demographic.

These tactics are well known amongst any who study history and have been used successfully time and again by the likes of the bolsheviks (Petrograd), nazis (Reichstag) and the manipulators of the U.S. (The Maine, The Lusitania, Operation Northwoods, The Gulf of Tonkin, 9/11).

Once these attacks have happened, all who oppose tyranny and the restriction of individual liberties will be labeled as belonging to the target demographic. At that point, the predictive programing will initiate and the weak minded will become violent and the enforcers will arrest, murder and otherwise attempt to decimate the target demographic.

This situation has long been warned about by those in the know, but sometimes it takes seeing the horror to believe it. And see it we will, because now it is here. It is here because we let this happen.

Our only hope is to get elected to our governments to prevent fraud and corruption, it is the only way to turn back what has now taken firm control of our nation.

U.S. DHS declares that opposition to tyranny is “extreme” and “terroristic”, and that “these extremists may seek to exploit the emergence of COVID-19 variants by viewing the potential re-establishment of public health restrictions across the United States as a rationale to conduct attacks”
This is how you prepare a premeditated response to the problem you are creating. This is the Hegelian dialectic; Problem, Reaction Solution. Just wait for the solution.

Pet lizard discovers its heritage

QUESTIONS

Nationally, as the illegitimate mask edicts slowly fade (for now) and the push for forcible vaccination grows, one question continues to loom over the growing battle of the government and its collaborators vs. the individual citizen:
Who is “right”?

Are those who stand defiant of arbitrary, forceful doctrine which infringes upon their personal liberties justified in their resistance?

Are the collaborators justified in giving the state carte-blanch with an ethical stamp of approval to create nonsensical, oppressive rules and laws, treating us all as they please?

Are all rules promulgated by government automatically righteous?

HISTORY

I seem to remember reading about past “laws” and “rules” which dictated that men were slaves and could be bought and sold as cattle and that only certain groups could have a voice in their government. I would not call those laws and rules righteous.

I also remember a seemingly forgotten enemy of the state who bore his cross through the streets as he was spat on and berated by the collaborators of the state. I would not call the behavior of those collaborators righteous.

MAJORITY

At times it would appear, whether truly or through deception, that those who choose to collaborate represent the “majority”. If so, what of the “majority”?

Well, someone once said ‘the road to hell is an easy, nicely paved ride, but the road to heaven, that’s a tough trip’.

Which path would the “majority” take?

SIDES

So it would seem we have two unclearly defined sides comprised of individuals that, though we may each be very nuanced in our motives and reasoning, have commonalities that are pulling us all one way or another.

On one side we have the government and its collaborators. This is a group of power: those lusting for it and those bowing to it. The impetus of that power is no longer debatable and has manifested itself within the highest levels of our state. This power group is becoming less and less tolerant of individual liberty and is in full preparation for violent oppression and conflict.

On the other side we have a group of individuals. These individuals may have nothing in common other than the desire to be individuals and to exert their own free will. These individuals do not lust for power and have difficulty bowing to it. They tend to be untrusting and discerning, with enough respect for their own discernment to form their own opinions and to question what is presented to them.

These two groups are antithetical to each other and cannot exist passively within the same state. The power group will eternally strive to subjugate the individuals, while true individuals will never submit. This is the ages long struggle that has guided our history, but the question remains, which side is right?

ONLY FREE WILL MAY CHOOSE

Throughout history, the state has strived to become the moral conscience of the masses, to guide not only the physical direction of its subjects but their spiritual paths as well. Collaborators have consistently bowed to the power of the state and accepted its guidance. At times they have truly been the vast majority of the populace, frequently making the free-willed individual a rarity. Just because they are the majority and have accepted the edicts of their masters, does that make them “right”?

If we are to leave the most important decision of our lives, the discernment between righteousness and unrighteousness, at the whim of those who lust for power, how can we ever be “right”? If we are to sacrifice our most important attribute, free will, to the authority of others, can we ever ensure our righteousness?

ANSWER

The answer is that it is up to each of us as individuals to discern, to choose what is right. Allowing others to do so for us is counter to the purpose of not only the question asked here, but to our existence as humanity.

There will always be those who decide to take the easy ride and side with power. In doing so they end up sacrificing the very attribute they use to make their choice – free will.

Then there will always be those few who take the difficult road, not because it is difficult but because free will dictates it and without individual free will, what are we? We cannot be right or wrong, we cannot truly love or hate. We are slaves to our masters, and at the whim of our master’s intent.

Free-willed decisions do not necessarily equate righteousness and decisions made of free will are not always right or always wrong, but they are always free, and that is our purpose.

So while some may choose to sacrifice what makes them free and put their spiritual fate in the hands of others, I think I’ll stand with that enemy of the state, join the unorganized, persecuted minority and take the tough trip.
I’ve got a feeling it’s the right thing to do.

General Flynn pardoned

David Icke breaks it down